Baudolino
❧ Baudolino of Alessandria — illuminated after the medieval fashion ❧
On Umberto Eco’s Novel
The Art of the Beautiful Lie
Humor, Wisdom & the Deeper Meanings of Baudolino
There is something wonderfully subversive about Umberto Eco writing a novel whose hero is history’s most gifted liar who eventually rides off into the sunset after getting stoned when he finally tells only truths. Baudolino, published in 2000, is many things at once — a picaresque adventure set in florid historical fiction, a philosophical comedy, a meditation on faith, and a sly wink from one of the twentieth century’s great semioticians. It is also, and this is easy to miss amid the erudition, deeply, persistently funny.
The Comedy of the Sacred Absurd
Eco’s humor in Baudolino is the humor of a man who knows exactly how ridiculous the Middle Ages were — and loves them anyway. Baudolino and his companions fabricate Christian letters and relics with the cheerful professionalism of a medieval counterfeiting ring: a vial of the Holy Foreskin, the skull of John the Baptist (several of which, Eco slyly notes, circulated across Europe simultaneously), the bones of the Magi. The Church receives each forgery with thunderous reverence. No thunderbolt falls. Heaven does not object. The world simply absorbs the fabrications and carries on. Even the Holy Shroud finds an explanation in Baudolino's adventures which are often compared to a Medieval Forrest Gump.
Then there is the finer comedy of the theological debates. When Baudolino’s companions argue for hundreds of pages about the nature of Christ — Was he wholly divine? Partly human? Both? Neither? Could God suffer? — Eco gives these arguments genuine philosophical rigor while letting them spiral into magnificent absurdity. Eco's brilliance here is the manner of showcasing the debates themselves as dialogues in the manner of the classic authors of centuries past who were often skirting the limits of what might find them thrown in prison (or worse).
“Baudolino’s greatest gift is not the lie itself — it is the sincerity with which he believes his own inventions, and the way those inventions stubbornly insist on becoming real.”
The Evolution of Baudolino
Baudolino begins as pure appetite: a gifted, instinctive liar with a golden tongue and no particular philosophy. He lies because lying comes naturally, because a well-constructed fiction seems to him more satisfying than a dull truth. He is the village boy who discovers he can make the world bend to his words.
But the novel is, at its deepest level, a story about what happens when your fictions escape you. Baudolino embellishes the legend of Prester John’s kingdom — a perfect Christian realm in the mysterious East — and forges a letter from Prester John as a kind of courtly gift to Frederick Barbarossa. And then the story takes on a life of its own. His companions believe it. Frederick believes it. He cannot unmake it. He is now in pursuit of his own invention, drawn eastward by a fiction he can no longer control. The beauty of much of the novel is how deeply rooted it is in history as the Letter of Prester John actually did exist and was a widely circulated forgery of the time, as just one of many beautiful examples Umberto Eco drew upon for this fun romp through the Middle Ages.
By the novel’s end, Baudolino has lost nearly everyone he loved, witnessed atrocities, and arrived at a kind of weary, melancholy wisdom. The liar discovers that lies have weight. They crush things. They crush people. The final Baudolino is still capable of wonder, still fundamentally tender — but he carries his inventions like stones. In the end, his crushing truth sends him back out on his final quest to the east to never be seen again.
Frederick Barbarossa: The Father Who Needs the Myth
Frederick is a genuinely great man — intelligent, courageous, visionary — and yet utterly dependent on Baudolino’s fabrications to sustain his greatness. He cannot rule on power alone. He needs narrative legitimacy: a holy lineage, a divine mission, a destiny. Baudolino provides all of these, forging letters, inventing relics, constructing the theological scaffolding that turns a German king into a sacred emperor.
Their relationship has the quality of a love story. Frederick is the father Baudolino never had; Baudolino is the imagination Frederick lacks. Without Baudolino, Frederick is merely powerful. With him, he is mythic. This is Eco’s wry observation about power itself: the great man and the great storyteller need each other, and the man who holds the sword rarely understands how completely he is in the hands of the man who holds the pen.
The Friends from Alessandria
The companions Baudolino gathers from his hometown carry one of the novel’s deepest structural jokes: they are men from a city that should not exist. Alessandria was founded partly through Baudolino’s own forged letter to Frederick, a fabrication that somehow solidified into stone and mortar. These men are, from the very beginning, citizens of a fiction. It makes them perfectly suited to spend their lives chasing another one.
Boron and Kyot are the novel’s great intellectual comedians — brilliant men who construct elaborate systems of meaning around the Grail legend, weaving Neoplatonic philosophy, apocryphal theology, and pure imagination into structures of magnificent internal coherence. They represent the medieval intellectual’s characteristic tendency to mistake the elegance of a system for evidence of its truth.
The Poet — pointedly unnamed, which is itself the joke — is ambition stripped of conscience. He wants glory, attribution, and legacy, and will hitch himself to any cause that promises them. His namelessness is Eco’s way of saying he is a type rather than a person: the opportunist intellectual who exists in every century. He survives the novel longer than more virtuous characters, which is either Eco being honest about history or darkly funny, or both.
Together, the companions form a shadow Round Table — a fellowship organized around a quest that is, at its foundation, a fiction. The fellowship is real. The destination is the story the fellowship tells itself to keep moving.
Ardzrouni: Reason in the Wilderness
The Armenian engineer and philosopher Ardzrouni is one of Eco’s most inspired inclusions. He is a man of reason and mechanism — a builder of automata, a student of natural philosophy — dropped into a world organized entirely around faith, miracle, and the supernatural. He does not belong. He knows it. He proceeds anyway.
Ardzrouni represents the thin, persistent thread of empirical thinking that ran through the medieval world despite the overwhelming dominance of theological explanation. His mechanical creations are marvels his world cannot quite categorize — are they sorcery? Divine inspiration? Engineering? The man who explains everything believes in nothing, and believing in nothing turns out to offer surprisingly little protection.
Zosimos: History’s Loose End
Zosimos is the novel’s shadow figure, and Eco handles him with particular artfulness by never fully resolving him. He is almost certainly responsible for Barbarossa’s death (or so they believe) — a Greek monk who moves through the story like an infection, always present near catastrophe, always departing before accountability arrives. He is piety as performance, scholarship as camouflage.
His deeper meaning is epistemological. Real events leave loose ends. Real culprits go unpunished. The historical record is not a court of justice but a collection of more or less plausible stories — and Zosimos embodies that uncomfortable truth. He also carries the weight of Eco’s portrayal of Byzantine civilization: gorgeous, ancient, endlessly sophisticated, and entirely cynical. Constantinople in Baudolino is a world of pure surface, and Zosimos is its distilled essence.
Philosophy in Costume: Heresies and Holy Arguments
One of Eco’s greatest achievements in Baudolino is the way he embeds serious philosophical and theological argument into the fabric of adventure narrative so seamlessly that you may not notice you are being educated. The debates over Arianism, Monophysitism, the Bogomils, the Patarines — over whether Christ was fully divine, or partly human, or some unprecedented third thing — are not footnotes.
The difference between a saint and a heretic in twelfth-century Christianity was often a single Greek preposition — whether Christ was of the same substance as God, or merely of similar substance. Men were burned for a syllable. The theological battles feel, as Eco renders them, like the violence of people who have too much at stake in the answer.
“The difference between a saint and a heretic was often a single Greek preposition. Men were burned for a syllable.”
The monster-peoples of the East — the Blemmyae with their faces in their chests, the one-footed Sciapods, the dog-headed Cynocephali — enter this philosophical framework with characteristic Eco elegance. Are they human? Can they be baptized? Do they have souls? These questions are extensions of the same inquiry that produced the Christological controversies: what defines the boundary of the human? What Eco achieves across these discussions is a sympathetic archaeology of medieval thought — showing how people of genuine intelligence and sincere faith arrived at positions that seem to us fantastical or cruel.
The Final Meaning
At the end of Baudolino, we are reminded that the entire novel is a story told by Baudolino to Niketas Choniates, who will write it down as history. A confessed liar narrates his life to a historian who knows his narrator lies. What Niketas will eventually produce will be read as truth. The fabrication will solidify. This is how all history works, Eco insists — and his point is not cynical despair but something more complex: a kind of awed acceptance that human meaning is always constructed, always partly invented, and no less real for any of that.
Baudolino’s lies built a city. They moved an emperor. They sent men to their deaths chasing a paradise that existed only in his imagination — and in the imagination, those men found genuine love, genuine courage, and genuine wonder. The beautiful lie turns out to contain, curled within it, something that functions exactly like truth.
❧ Umberto Eco · Baudolino · 2000 · tr. William Weaver, 2002 ❧
Comments
Post a Comment